Tag Archives: logical fallacies

Hero Worship and the Black Belt Bait and Switch

by Al Alvir

Any person who is getting into any area of information exchange must learn the process of the exchange of knowledge and, with an open yet skeptical mind, discern what he/she is being told.  This is much easier said than practiced, because people want to blindly follow – it’s just easier.  What ability does anyone have to discern if they have no basis of understanding of a given subject?  Extracting truth is the responsible shopper’s responsibility.  Too bad there are too few of those kinds of people.  It’s why people get duped and conned, brainwashed and chopped-up.  There is a type of person who tends to get brainwashed.  Martial arts and fitness salesman from every discipline harness this laziness, or stupidity or gullibility or vulnerability.

Martial arts and fitness businessmen can be among the most unethical salesmen, so tied up in the scam that they don’t even know they’re lying anymore.  They know that people listen to authority figures, not for the validity of what they are saying, but for the authority figures’ authority.  That can come from many Ad-Hominem posits (look it up and know it, it may be the basis for your whole foundation of belief in the martial arts) – fight record, trained under so and so, owns large schools, or is simply just famous.  There are relations here, but no evidence to the person having any solid philosophies or the most basic sense of imparting knowledge.  It is simply a show that is being sold.  Maybe they’re like really good multi-level marketing gurus who abduct you with charisma.  Maybe it’s the black belt bait and switch.

Whatever it is, it is a sale on HERO WORSHIP.  Once a victim falls under a hero’s spell, he will believe whatever he is told.  He will pay for a hero’s dvd’s, bow, and brag about his hero.  He might even “work” at his hero’s dojo for free.  The scam can be as innocent and as vicious as any, but it’s still ubiquitous in martial arts.

Some of the most renowned martial artists – even decent ones in my book – use the hero worship thing to their advantage.  Some really well-rounded skeptical martial artists may even be susceptible to the con.  Perhaps they have trainers who tell great stories and show a different move, a different counter for another counter, every single day.  This sort of thing can be overwhelming and awe-inspiring; the kind of thing that may make a martial artist think “this teacher is the greatest fighter ever, he will kill anyone because he knows these moves.”  Bullshit, because the student never even had a chance to see his coach in a fight.  Bullshit, not because it is absolutely impossible, but because it is absolutely unproven.  Furthermore, with the understanding of how people learn, the teaching of a different move every day is the easy way out.  It is part of the hero worship con.  It’s a con because it doesn’t work in imparting knowledge to students, and it’s a con because it makes students think they are learning more than they are learning.  It’s a con because the money keeps on rolling-in.

This sort of thing is seen much less in boxing, mainly because there are few designations of authority, and title belts only become the next man’s drive to be better-than.  Boxing coaches tend not to partake and perpetuate the hero worship, but it happens.  Once, I demonstrated some hard punches for my boxers – they never see me throwing full tilt and I don’t get in the ring anymore due to some physical ailments – but they started talking about how amazingly I threw punches and how I’d kill other guys in the gym.  I quickly shot that idea down, because the last thing I wanted was a group of fighters starting the ball rolling on hero worship.  I may know more than any one of them, but I was no longer in shape to even go three rounds.  So let’s call it what it is.  Fighters like Mike Tyson had a specific kind of respect for Cus D’Amato, but it was something entirely different from hero worship (I’ll discuss this in another article).

But it does happen in boxing when fame and resume comes into play.  No one knows why Freddie Roach may be the best trainer, but he got the designation because he had the best fighters – someone new comes every year.  But anyone would get the best fighters if he had the opportunity to cherry-pick his talent while his gym floods with candidates to work with.  Still, no one on the election board, or whoever decides trainer of the year, actually knows who is the best trainer.  It’s subjective to the point of having almost no reference and no control group.  So perhaps the best way to tell who is the best is to see the grassroots production – how much do the fighters who go nowhere know?  That might be the most logical gauge, on the opposite end of the spectrum of hero worship.

Hero worship is a poor state of mind for any fighter.  The problem is the majority of martial arts coaches use it as a sales tool.  John Danaher gives pristine speeches that fool people, even unintentionally (but I don’t care), into thinking he is the be all guru of BJJ (he once stated his tactic of how to extract info from youtube and he used the ad hominem route, then reneged).  Some boxing guy self-proclaimed as the Mittologist does so, too, perhaps obliviously, through the use of the stupid moniker.  There are dumb people out there who will rather listen to a “Mittologist” than a boxing fanatic who studies this stuff 70 hours a week.  George Dillman famously harnesses hero worship through a complete hoax – you discern – of Chi or Ki.  He knocks down people without touching them, and says they must believe they will be knocked-down in order to feel the power.  People line up in droves to buy this stuff and topple over at his mere suggestion.  I once attended one of his martial arts seminars (before the Chi madness) where he was tapping people out with pressure point manipulation, and perhaps I was even then unsusceptible to the idiocy.  There is much more to the story – the a-hole yelling at me, my skeptical questions, etc.  But it ended with him lining people up as they tapped at his slightest touch.  I, however, let him dig his fingers deep into my arm joints to the point I thought the guy was going to have a heart attack before I finally tapped.  And I tapped from the general discomfort only after shadow-boxing a punch to his face and groin.  He let go and gave me a death stare.  I suppose that was when he was still a beginner with the Chi stuff, because I didn’t flinch.  George Dillman, what an embarrassing martial arts figure.  But this stuff can be seen in almost every other school or on Youtube where instructors fold their students in showy onslaughts of violent technique – the students just get thrown around and fake-punched, and the instructors sell it as “realistic encounters” as they puff their chests as though they were just in a fight.  It is as if they all believe their bullshit.

Students in any field tend to revere their teachers as they brown-nose with wide-eyed enthusiasm.  They tend to sheepishly patronize.  Traditional-martial-art-minded martial artists tend to tap quickly to moves and fall without resistance.  I’ve done it once or twice, too, but only for the reason to move on with the practice, but you will see students with the greater tendencies to hero-worship, lengthening their learning curve and perpetuating things being done wrong and even perpetuating lack of toughness.

Top mma guys often make themselves out to be pristine leaders in their fields, but that has always been part of the hoax and part of the intriguing beauty of martial arts.  They make lofty quotes and hold themselves high like celebrity gurus; but trainers should just be what they are: people with the time by which they have accumulated knowledge and who now have more time and impart continuing knowledge.  Along with talents, smarts, and fanaticism, coaches could help their fighters benefit to differing degrees.  But I ask them to please spare the pretentious mumbo jumbo and lofty quotes that may raise their appeal to naïve teenagers and uneducated alcoholics.  Realize that they continue to harness the effects of hero worship and brainwashing.  Any great teacher should strive to make someone born of the opposite mindset and impregnable to the like.

He’s usually called a fighter who wants to be the best.

Even better than his teacher.

Mittology – A Review

by Coach Al

I’ve borrowed some of Roger Mayweather’s mittwork for the live, conventional mittwork that I do. But by no means can I ever condone it solely to be proper mittwork. A New Jersey based trainer, Coach Rick, or his corny pseudonym, “The Mittologist,” sells this stuff on youtube and even has some $199 con for becoming certified in Mittology. Floyd Mayweather wannabes across the globe are following suit.

Say goodbye to the old-time art of live mittwork.

Mittwork nowadays across the US consists of guys throwing fast combinations of quarter punches with their hands held really low and little hip being used. The Mittologist is not the only one selling this. Coaches get into the set patterns and find that it’s the easiest way to take people’s money (I’ve heard that from a few coaches themselves). Because this Mittology, above all benefits (if any), is fun for most people – especially beginners. Perhaps it wasn’t meant to be just a money maker and flashy, but after the set patterns are learned, this stuff is disgustingly easy – especially for the coaches.

First of all, the coaches don’t have to go through the grueling hard work of coaching distance, angles, and strategy when doing this Mittology stuff. There is no randomness, bumps, clinches, spins, getting hit, punching at the same time as blocking, and there are no options (you must move in the set patterns). Second, it is still exciting and fun, yet it has the incomparable variable of being safe. It’s like the TaeBo of mittwork – the people, even actual boxers, think they’re really getting authentic boxing mittwork, but they’re getting more of a workout as opposed to real moves and real education.

After having one vapid boxer of mine – one who came to me already brainwashed by Floyd Mayweather Jr. – actually purchase the Mittologist’s videos, I watched a few of them with an open mind (just on November 19, 2012). No doubt, I think the Mittologist guy probably knows better and is just making a business move on the sport, making videos that are virtual knockoffs of Roger Mayweather’s set patterns. This whoring is what I have a problem with. I can’t say that technical and detailed work isn’t done with fighters away from his mitts, but I am saying that this mittwork is brainwashing viewers into thinking that it’s “the secret to better boxing and coaching.” I’ve heard no mention that sparring and alternative work is essential. Not once did I hear mention that conventional mittwork is good to work into his routines. And it really gets on my nerves that there is a stupid certification that seems like anyone can buy. What governing body gave him the right to certify anyone? Can any coach make up some stupid gimmick and certify it? I have a number system that I created for communicating angles and head locations and punches; should I certify people who pay me? Where is the profession and years of understanding boxing inside and out that goes into the coaching? He calls it technical mittwork, but it is almost absolute in being the opposite of that. This is my issue with many youtube coaches. There are probably only 3 known ones that I can cosign. There are innumerable hacks on youtube, but at least some, even the non-boxers, don’t make up catchy names and rename boxing moves like this guy.  My point is that much of the sale of these videos gambles on people’s perceptions and their false correlations: they think Floyd Mayweather Jr. was successful doing this stuff, so they think this stuff must work the best. It is the classic idiot’s trap. It’s akin to an ad hominem argument – an argument made against an opponent, as opposed to an argument against the opponent’s argument. If I said Roger Mayweather sucks on the mitts, someone might retort that I don’t have the best fighter in the world, so I must be wrong. Such illogic are important factors to understand when deciding for or against this type of stuff. Many coaches I speak to agree with me, yet some of them are doing this mittwork because white-collar recreational boxers buy into this stuff.

The Mittologist claims that this mittwork instills fluidity and reaction. I contend that live mittwork does that and more. Live mittwork, on the other hand, doesn’t have the shortcomings of fake blocks and shoulder touches and quarter punches. When I do mittwork, I really punch at the fighters, and I really review the techniques and strategies. I have mittwork for opposite stances and for same stances. I mimic different fighting styles and throw punches in different ways. I often wear a body-shield so fighters can go to my body at will. I catch punches with the mitts on my head, too. My mittwork is comprehensive, not just aerobic. Fighters get to feel almost like they’re in a fight. I treat every boxer differently, and I feed the mitts differently to each of them. They, in turn, learn fluidity and reaction without the hoax. How is Mittology any better than this convention? How is Mittology any good, period? Is it like Karate’s Katas versus sparring. Do boxers even shadowbox the way they do this mittwork? Do they fight that way, too? The answer is an expletive and “no.”

I am knocking this stuff because I think its widespread appeal is based on gimmick and exploiting the ignorance of people who don’t know boxing. Perhaps the guys who do this know more than what the rote mittwork exhibits, but I am only going off on the mittwork itself. Check out the mittwork on the internet. The boxers often don’t protect their heads, they don’t turn their hips, and they don’t turn over their punches. They don’t even really roll or block punches. They aren’t even actually punching too much of the time. This doesn’t make all these mittwork routines necessarily wrong, but the fake stuff is a major part of the selling of this crap. The appeal is that it’s fast and non-stop; it looks cool to people who don’t know how easy it is. Manny Masson does a similar routine with Yuriorkis Gamboa, but the techniques are almost fully completed, thus the punches and movements are more realistic; this is much more difficult, although Masson also just touches Gamboa’s shoulders. And I question how random any of their stuff is, as well. When you watch live mittwork, you will see mistakes every round (e.g. missed counters, late moves, hesitations, and people getting touched with punches). Live mittwork is not based on set patterns and solely verbal queues. It’s live, physical, and cerebral, and you benefit from getting as close to sparring as you can while practicing detailed strategy and technique. Even the set patterns have their randomness as it’s mixed in with all the other work. Mittology seems to be just another workout drill, like bad double-end work in which guys don’t really throw complete punches and don’t move realistically.

When I argued with my ignorant boxer on how stupid I thought the patty-cake Mittology mittwork is, the young boxer even said to me, “If this mittwork is so bad, why is the Mittologist’s wife a golden gloves champ?” I told him to look up Logical Fallacies and then, only then, work on an informed opinion.

No matter what, I will never give him a behind the back mitt feed. I’d rather lose him to the grift.